Every time the anti-gun crowd makes their argument for more gun control or gun confiscation they reveal their ignorance about firearms. Remember terms like “ghost gun” or “multi-automatic assault weapons”?
It makes sense that to have such a skewed argument for supporting the disarmament of defenseless innocent people that it would also be coupled with a lack of knowledge.
While appearing on Foxnews, Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky argued against gun owners carrying concealed weapons to neutralize potential mass shooters by noting she has “no idea how to shoot anybody.” So there you have it. Finally a clear argument for disarming American citizens.
Sean Hannity is licensed to carry a concealed firearm. He asked Roginsky if she would want to be in room with defenseless individuals or with gun-carrying citizens should terrorists enter the room and start shooting.
Instead of answering the question (of course she had to deflect), she asked a question of her own saying,
“Here’s my question: Do you want me in that room? Because I have the same access to guns as you would and I have no idea how to shoot anybody. That’s the difficulty.”
Conservative Michelle Malkin fired back with a response of her own.
“I’d want every grown woman in that room to also be trained and armed,” she said. “And I’m going to make sure my own daughter, who is now a teenager, understands that, of course, being armed in self-defense is the great equalizer whether you are talking about defending against a rapist or a jihadist.”
Malkin went on to claim that the “political culture and the media” are more comfortable demonizing law-abiding “Christian” gun owners than they are “jihadists that want to kill us by any means necessary.”
Here is the video of the exchange as seen on Foxnews: